Pages

Friday, June 21, 2013

Silencing Tactics Part 3: Put up, or shut up.

How often have I been someplace where I've seen or heard something, or read something online that I found offensive to women? Nearly every day of my life for the past 25 years. That's really, really often. How often have I had the courage to say something about it? Decidedly less often. How many times have I worked up the ovaries to say something, only to be told "It's a man's world, lady. If you want to get ahead, you'd better learn to deal with it."  Or this: "[insert name of public online forum and/or public place] is supposed to be a place where I can express myself freely. If you don't like it, you don't have to read it/participate/work in this field."

This is a shitty thing to say. Why?


  • Because it treats the question of whether I should speak up for myself as a question of etiquette.
  • Because it isn't just a way of telling me to shut up, it's also a way of pressuring me to cease participation in this group. Which (I will say out loud because it seems so easily overlooked) I have every bit as much right to participate in as you do. But of course, you are doing it in such a way as to force me to make the decision to exclude *myself* from this activity. Speaking of which...
  • Because it's not nice to ask someone to make a choice between being offended, and being excluded. This tactic places the responsibility on the marginalized person to take responsibility for her offense by just *avoiding* (as though psychic) being in places where she might be offended in the first place, or avoiding overhearing things that make her feel belittled and remind her of her "place".
  • Because it allows the person who says it to avoid taking any responsibility for the consequences of his speech or actions.
  • Because it assumes that the free speech of the offender is more important - on a personal, individual level, not just a theoretical one - than the emotional well-being of the offended.

What you probably should consider doing before opening your mouth to tell me or any other woman to nut up, is to take into consideration the 50% of the population who are female, and who have been marginalized for hundreds of generations simply because they are born with different reproductive organs than you. What you need to understand is this: women are not a "special interest group," despite what you may have been conditioned to believe. My sex is something that is innate, coincidental, and almost entirely out of my control. I did not choose to belong to this  marginalized group called "Women." I was partially robbed of my right to self-determination at birth - to an extent which you, a privileged male, can never fully understand. I have been lumped into this caste of people who are considered "other" or "less than" not through any choice of my own, but by a societal construct which favors you. And now you are asking me to think and behave as though I am not a member of this category at all.

So no, I will not put up or nut up. I will speak up for myself when you're trying to tell me to shut-the-fuck-up and sit-the-fuck down. I will not exclude myself - I will just bring more like me to support me. We have just as much right to be here as you do, and you'll just have to get used to it.

Tuesday, June 4, 2013

The Feminist Pervert

I've begun leading a class for people in the Kink/BDSM communities lately called The Feminist Pervert. The subject matter and class style varies somewhat depending on the venue, but essentially the goal of the class is to create a space where people in these communities feel empowered to have guilt-free, brass-tacks conversations about sexism, in order to make their community a more welcoming and safe space for people of all gender identities, sexual orientations, and kink identities.

I taught this class a few days ago at Shibaricon. I was so excited to have the opportunity to teach to that group of kinky people because those people are rope people, and rope people are my people. I'm into lots of crazy, perverted stuff, but when it comes down to it, rope is my desert-island toy. So on the last day of the convention, when everyone was exhausted and wanting to sleep in and trying to check out of the hotel in time, imagine my surprise when a few dozen people showed up and looked really happy. It made me happy and gave me a great sense of solidarity to know that all those people were there because we shared a common interest and concern.

I started out with the ususal introductions and asked the class what they hoped to get out of the discussion. Several things were mentioned: safe spaces; listening; how to respond to sexism; the conflict between being a feminist and engaging in consensual BDSM; a few others. For the first time, I set a goal for the class, which was that I wanted to come up with some "best practices" for engaging non-feminists in our community about how to make it feel safer for everyone. And then we started in on the discussion.

One of the first questions was a man asking about paying women compliments. He asked us: Why was this so hard? Why were some women so offended? He found himself confused, he said. And then he went on to say how it seems like women in the BDSM scene who dress in ways that show off their bodily assets, but get upset when complimented, are sending "mixed messages".

Every hackle in the room went up. You could FEEL it happen. Suddenly, in this space that was supposed to be a safe space for women (among other people) - who often have to have their defenses at least at the ready - everyone felt defensive. If I had not been leading the group, I imagine my reaction would have been remarkably similar.

This was a perfect demonstration of something that is a big puzzle to so many of us in the kinky community - how a question asked honestly - a seemingly innocuous one, to the speaker - could make so many people upset. Standing in front of the class, I found myself able to see a larger picture of that moment. That's not something I'm frequently able to do when discussing sexism, because it affects me so profoundly and so personally. I wanted the women in the class to be able to address this, to be sure. I empathized with them in that moment. But I also found that I could feel compassion for the man asking the question. He had chosen to attend this class - he wanted to be a part of finding answers and solutions to this stuff, too. He had chosen, also, to ask this question - which signaled he was open to listening. And although several of the people in the class had expressed that part of the reason they attended this class was to bypass the "Feminism 101" stuff on which this kind of class sometimes dwells, I wanted to take this opportunity to help gain an ally; rather than shutting this man out of our conversation, I wanted him to join it.

So I asked the class to respond how they truly felt. But first I asked them to respond to this man in this room, who was a person just as we all are, and who did not come into the room with the intention of estranging himself, but rather with allying himself to our conversation.

Immediately 25 hands went up. As I was about to call on someone else, one woman seated on the floor to my left said clearly and straightforwardly:

"That made me uncomfortable."

I realized that one sentence was the strongest thing anyone could have said. Because it didn't carry any kind of loaded message - there was no blame in it, no guilt or secondary emotions, just a statement of truth. So often we engage with other people who don't understand where we're coming from in an antagonistic way, and we end up playing offense or defense in a conversation.

Of course we went on to talk about why she and so many other people had felt that way, and that felt good to have created a safe space in which to do that, without fear of being shot down. The man who had asked the question looked distraught, but didn't try to defend what he'd said - he just engaged with the strong women responding to his question by listening, actively and with the intention of learning truthful answers to his question.

And of course the class went on to talk about other issues, and to come up with some "best practices" - or at least, the beginnings of them - in addressing sexism and in having these conversations in our communities. But that one little statement and the way it was said really stuck with me, and it took me a week to realize why. Here's what I think:

While I know (from experience) it's important sometimes just to stand up for ourselves and exercise our strong voices in conversations like this, I realized that it's equally important to let down our defenses and invite the person we're engaging with to see some of what our defenses are guarding us from - the real discomfort and hurt that sexist language and attitudes and culture can create in real people. If we can be strong enough to address someone who has hurt us with compassion and truth, we are inviting them to have compassion for us in return. That's the place where real understanding and new - shared - perspectives can happen. Where we, as individuals, can make choices not to say or do things that alienate or hurt other individuals. Which is just the very thing that both kinky people and feminists are looking for when we gather together.